#25 Josh Fraser

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Trezegol
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: Doncaster East

Post by Trezegol »

We need josh to get stuck into those quadruple stack burgers from hungry jacks.

If that can't get him to put the weight on, nothing will!

Additionally, we need to provide him with a hearing implant so that one of the assistants can tell him when to jump at the centre bounces.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Problem is Frasers best game for the year wasn't in the black and white.

I do think if Wood can stand up next year and be our No.1 Ruckman, Josh will benefit greatly as it will allow him to play in the more suitable role as a follower. His best work is done when he is freed up around the ground, on the wings, not in the hustle and bustle of man on man ruck duels.

Both Wood and Fraser will benefit greatly if they can add some strength to there bodies, if they don't, can't see much changing next year.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
rocketronnie
Posts: 8821
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Reservoir

Post by rocketronnie »

jack_spain wrote:
Frank Stone wrote:
Mr. Chairman wrote:Apparently Im the only who thinks his ruckwork is improving.
Yes I agree, that's why he was selected to represent Victoria in front of many others
Sorry guys, with respect to the Victorian selectors it only highlights the poor ruck stocks in Victoria. I'd really like to praise Josh, he's a good bloke and all that, but he is far too inconsistent for my liking and hardly inspires by revving up his players on the field. The biggest problem he has in the centre circle is an inability to jump in time with the bounce of the ball. He always seems too jump early. But I don't dispute the fact that he is our number # ruckman. In an ideal world he would find a valuable place in our team as a tall forward.
So you say anyway. His ruck work has been mostly good I've thought and his around the ground work when he is fit is very damaging. And as for revving up etc., of course the players who wanted him for captain over Burns don't know anything either...

arrgh its a pity The Weed is so old eh Jack? :twisted:
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad".
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

burnsy17 wrote:
Fire Up wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:How about needing him to grow 6 more cm's into the correct size for a ruckman.....?
208's the minimum nowadays is it?
He was talking about Bryan and at 197cm is too Short Now for a Ruckman
no dave it was about josh
It was about Josh and yes, 202 or whatever he is isnt enough clearly... he cant buy a tap out. He has no presence. Nothing.
I reckon his tap work's been good, and has actually improved over time.
He has struggled to stand up to the rigours week in week out though. I guess it's not easy with such a slight frame, and pretty much having to play as our number 1 since the age of 17.

He's certainly tall enough though. Kruezer's shorter, and the Blues seem happy enough with him.
User avatar
Mr. Chairman
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by Mr. Chairman »

This season he averaged 14 touches .7 goal a game and just over 15 ho's.

If he can lift that to about 16 touches a goal a game and 16 ho's thats a great output. I think its possible if he's fit.
He won't be going anywhere
I have it on good authority
It's a done deal
User avatar
mudlark
Posts: 3561
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: Maroochydore Qld
Contact:

Post by mudlark »

rocketronnie wrote:
jack_spain wrote:The Tin Man needs to get a heart...
That's very cheap Jack Spain.

It's easy to criticise Josh but I don't see many viable alternative players being put forward by you... and Murray Weideman and Gabbo are just too damn old. so where are they going to come from? :twisted:

I regard Josh as our best option going forward and the best option for our next captain should Scot Burns retire. It was no surprise to me that represented Victoria as first ruck. The selectors for that game were clearly knowledgeable people regarding our game.
Thats not a very cheap shot at all Rocketronnie,,It's as weak as piss :evil:
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54851
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

Mr. Chairman wrote:Apparently Im the only who thinks his ruckwork is improving.
No, there's more than 1 of us. His ruck work is improving - I think the circle has actually helped him, he holds his own at around the ground ruck contests and when fit, is a damaging extra midfielder in the Cox mold.

Very valuable member of the team and has plenty of heart, even if some don't see it.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Pied Piper
Posts: 6196
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 12:45 am
Location: Pig City
Contact:

Post by Pied Piper »

jack_spain wrote:
Frank Stone wrote:
Mr. Chairman wrote:Apparently Im the only who thinks his ruckwork is improving.
Yes I agree, that's why he was selected to represent Victoria in front of many others
Sorry guys, with respect to the Victorian selectors it only highlights the poor ruck stocks in Victoria. I'd really like to praise Josh, he's a good bloke and all that, but he is far too inconsistent for my liking and hardly inspires by revving up his players on the field. The biggest problem he has in the centre circle is an inability to jump in time with the bounce of the ball. He always seems too jump early. But I don't dispute the fact that he is our number # ruckman. In an ideal world he would find a valuable place in our team as a tall forward.
You obviously missed his reaction when he kicked that first-quarter goal against Adelaide. That was a pretty decent rev-up. He was just about our best finals player, as he has been before. So yeah, I thought the tin man jibe was out of order, too.
"The greatest thing that could happen to the nation is when we get rid of all the media. Then we could live in peace and tranquillity, and no one would know anything." - Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen
User avatar
rocketronnie
Posts: 8821
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Reservoir

Post by rocketronnie »

Pied Piper wrote:
jack_spain wrote:
Frank Stone wrote:
Mr. Chairman wrote:Apparently Im the only who thinks his ruckwork is improving.
Yes I agree, that's why he was selected to represent Victoria in front of many others
Sorry guys, with respect to the Victorian selectors it only highlights the poor ruck stocks in Victoria. I'd really like to praise Josh, he's a good bloke and all that, but he is far too inconsistent for my liking and hardly inspires by revving up his players on the field. The biggest problem he has in the centre circle is an inability to jump in time with the bounce of the ball. He always seems too jump early. But I don't dispute the fact that he is our number # ruckman. In an ideal world he would find a valuable place in our team as a tall forward.
You obviously missed his reaction when he kicked that first-quarter goal against Adelaide. That was a pretty decent rev-up. He was just about our best finals player, as he has been before. So yeah, I thought the tin man jibe was out of order, too.
Hi PP

I thought his ruck work was good and getting better since he came back from the knee injury, and particularly so in the games since passengergate. He has displayed good leadership since then too. His goal opportunities have dropped off as Mick isn't playing him forward as often as he did. Before that he was a regular goal scorer for us.

What he does need is genuine support. Wood is young but seems hot and cold and rarely gives a four quarter effort while bozo Bryan tries but is not skilled enough to play at senior level. We need a real second ruck option to properly support Josh so he doesn't always have to carry the load himself.

I hope he gets the captaincy next year. He will be a great captain for us.
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad".
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by BBHS »

Josh is a big game player. Dare I say if he was fit for the finals last year we may have gone a bit further. Jack Tin Man was pretty harsh not a fan of that.
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

rocketronnie wrote:arrgh its a pity The Weed is so old eh Jack? :twisted:
Ah if only we could have bottled whatever spirit it was he played with mate. Or Darren Millane. :D
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

Pied Piper wrote: You obviously missed his reaction when he kicked that first-quarter goal against Adelaide. That was a pretty decent rev-up. He was just about our best finals player, as he has been before. So yeah, I thought the tin man jibe was out of order, too.
Well, I'll withdraw the jibe if it hurts his feelings. But sorry PP I did see the reaction to his goal - and it was a great goal! But I wish I'd seen more of Josh against the Thugs last Saturday night. Because my lasting memory is that botched forward entry where he kicked it straight to a Thugs player when we had at least a couple of forwards by themselves. The kick went barely 20 metres! But hey, he wasn't Robinson Crusoe was he?

At the very least I do not go back on my assessment that Josh can't get his timing right in the ruck. He always seems to jump too soon. Perhaps the club should get Damien Monkhorst down to give the boys a bit of a pointer on ruck play.
User avatar
Pied Piper
Posts: 6196
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 12:45 am
Location: Pig City
Contact:

Post by Pied Piper »

rocketronnie wrote:Hi PP

I thought his ruck work was good and getting better since he came back from the knee injury, and particularly so in the games since passengergate. He has displayed good leadership since then too. His goal opportunities have dropped off as Mick isn't playing him forward as often as he did. Before that he was a regular goal scorer for us.

What he does need is genuine support. Wood is young but seems hot and cold and rarely gives a four quarter effort while bozo Bryan tries but is not skilled enough to play at senior level. We need a real second ruck option to properly support Josh so he doesn't always have to carry the load himself.

I hope he gets the captaincy next year. He will be a great captain for us.
Yeah RR, I'll be honest and say I ran a poll about midway through the year gauging opinions on whether or not Josh should be put up for trade. I had just about given up on him then - not his ruckwork, which I've always thought was underrated, but his fitness, really. I ran the poll with a heavy heart, but at the time I thought he was unlikely to get much better. I also thought his leadership was lacking something at the time. But he redeemed himself in the latter third of the year and his finals series was excellent.

If he can stay fit, he will make a huge difference. As he showed in the All-Star game and the finals series again, he is a big-game player of rare ability. That shows true leadership IMHO, and he always has seemed to thrive with extra responsibility in the past.

I completely agree about lack of support. Bryan had an excellent spell mid-year but he is just such a doofus. Wood is developing, but I suspect he should be put in the team and kept there next year for both his sake and the club's.
"The greatest thing that could happen to the nation is when we get rid of all the media. Then we could live in peace and tranquillity, and no one would know anything." - Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen
User avatar
Pied Piper
Posts: 6196
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 12:45 am
Location: Pig City
Contact:

Post by Pied Piper »

jack_spain wrote:
Pied Piper wrote: You obviously missed his reaction when he kicked that first-quarter goal against Adelaide. That was a pretty decent rev-up. He was just about our best finals player, as he has been before. So yeah, I thought the tin man jibe was out of order, too.
Well, I'll withdraw the jibe if it hurts his feelings. But sorry PP I did see the reaction to his goal - and it was a great goal! But I wish I'd seen more of Josh against the Thugs last Saturday night. Because my lasting memory is that botched forward entry where he kicked it straight to a Thugs player when we had at least a couple of forwards by themselves. The kick went barely 20 metres! But hey, he wasn't Robinson Crusoe was he?

At the very least I do not go back on my assessment that Josh can't get his timing right in the ruck. He always seems to jump too soon. Perhaps the club should get Damien Monkhorst down to give the boys a bit of a pointer on ruck play.
Yes, he certainly wasn't alone in terms of forward 50 entries - that was disastrous all night.

A point about jumping. It's not necessarily mistimed; it's actually a legitimate ruck tactic to disrupt the jump of a higher leaper or stronger-bodied player. I've seen him towel up no less a ruckman than Peter Everitt (when he was a best and fairest winner with Hawthorn) using this tactic.

I think Josh works well within his limitations, and when he's fit and able to get his hands on the ball you might find a surprising number of his taps find the mark. I don't think many of his detractors WANT to see that, though.

BTW you should withdraw the tin man jibe because it's completely unfair and inaccurate considering his finals performance. I don't think he would worry too much what you thought! :wink:
"The greatest thing that could happen to the nation is when we get rid of all the media. Then we could live in peace and tranquillity, and no one would know anything." - Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

Pied Piper wrote: I don't think he would worry too much what you thought! :wink:
I should hope not! Or he should harden the $%^& up. :wink:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by jack_spain on Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply