ASADA & the AFL acted lawfully: Hird & Essendon lose
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 8:46 am
- Location: Tyaak Vic
-
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 8:46 am
- Location: Tyaak Vic
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: melbourne, victoria
- Damien
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
- Location: Croydon Vic
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 11 times
Golden boys off to the states this morning on another business junket funded by Essendon members.Warbler wrote:I sincerely hope that Hird doesn't resign -
I want him to suffer the shame of being sacked .
Then I want the players to sue him .
Then I want him & his feral wife to crawl back under whatever rock in NSW or ACT that he came from , & never be hird of again .
GO PIES
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
The Herald - 1930
- Damien
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
- Location: Croydon Vic
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 11 times
Once the Essendon players get done , I think they should have an official ceremonial 'take back' for Jobe Watson. Where the runner up of that year (was it cotchin) gets to take it from around his neck at a gala dinnerneds elbow wrote:Going to be a bit awkward if Heppel wins the Brownlow on Monday night?
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
The Herald - 1930
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Queensland
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 24 times
I blame the players they had access to the annual anti droping lectures, internet, ASADA, their own managers, the AFL hotline and AFLPA and instead chose not to involve any of them.Damien wrote:
Nobody blames the players. Everyone feels that they just did what they were told and after all most of them are kids. And that doesn't change if they plead guilty in my view.
The high level we hold 14 year old Chinese Olympic swimmers to should be the level we hold adult males in professional sport to.
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
- Greening gold
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:22 am
- Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 1 time
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
- Damien
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
- Location: Croydon Vic
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 11 times
I think you're being harsh there Neil.neil wrote:I blame the players they had access to the annual anti droping lectures, internet, ASADA, their own managers, the AFL hotline and AFLPA and instead chose not to involve any of them.Damien wrote:
Nobody blames the players. Everyone feels that they just did what they were told and after all most of them are kids. And that doesn't change if they plead guilty in my view.
The high level we hold 14 year old Chinese Olympic swimmers to should be the level we hold adult males in professional sport to.
The Chinese swimmers were victims too, they would have had little choice to sign up to what was an established system of drug cheating. The only way to punish the system was remove their swimmers.
Many of the Essendon players were there already just doing their best to play footy when Hird decided to go down the pharmacological experiment route.
I'm not suggesting they don't get punished. What I'm saying is that History won't judge them as drug cheats when they were just guinea pigs.
History will judge Hird and Dank as the villains. Bomber Thompson to a lesser degree although it seems clear he made 'some' effort to pull this thing up.
I don't know anyone who thinks the players willingly went out to cheat. Hird went out to push the envelope to the limit and will now pay the ultimate price.
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
The Herald - 1930
- Jezza
- Posts: 29321
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 176 times
- Been liked: 243 times
Yes wrong choice of words mate!Pies4shaw wrote:That ain't no summary, Jezza. That's all 500 paragraphs of the reasons for decision. The judge only read excerpts in Court today.
Nevertheless it's interesting skim reading the full report of this case and what Justice Middleton held.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
so the little herd didn't find their way to a liesome home...
Graham Smith:a partner with Clayton Utz and a leading industrial relations and employment law specialist,
"The decision is a complete vindication of the actions taken by ASADA. It is a comprehensive and closely reasoned decision that is unlikely to be overturned on appeal, in my view
"Indeed, the task of an appellant to overturn a judgment cannot be overstated. It is very hard. There must generally be a clear error of law for an appeal court to find that one of their colleagues was mistaken in approach."
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/b ... z3DrrIJNGB
Graham Smith:a partner with Clayton Utz and a leading industrial relations and employment law specialist,
"The decision is a complete vindication of the actions taken by ASADA. It is a comprehensive and closely reasoned decision that is unlikely to be overturned on appeal, in my view
"Indeed, the task of an appellant to overturn a judgment cannot be overstated. It is very hard. There must generally be a clear error of law for an appeal court to find that one of their colleagues was mistaken in approach."
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/b ... z3DrrIJNGB
woodsmen rule
- Geek
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:42 am
- Location: Jacana
... only for Caff to get in there first to keep Cotchin at bay and having a big old sook, while Pendles swoops in to take it awayDamien wrote:Once the Essendon players get done , I think they should have an official ceremonial 'take back' for Jobe Watson. Where the runner up of that year (was it cotchin) gets to take it from around his neck at a gala dinnerneds elbow wrote:Going to be a bit awkward if Heppel wins the Brownlow on Monday night?