GB votes - Pies v Aints

roar · Post by **roar** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:41 am

3. Leroy (onya big fella! keep proving me wrong)
2. Swan
1. Most of the rest of them.

Doc63 · Post by **Doc63** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:56 am

3. Swan
2. Didak
1. Pendlebury

Apologies to the other 19 players.

singoman · Post by **singoman** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:46 pm

3. Swan - The Big Footy posters that keep bagging this bloke are absolute clowns! Keep embarrassing them Swanlow!

2. Pendles - Such a great decision maker with and without the footy.

1. Ball - Hard man provided so many clearances for us and always in and under when it counts

Apologies to Brown (great game), Thomas, Didaka

Captain_MyCaptain · Post by **Captain_MyCaptain** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:04 pm

3. Dane Swan

2. Leigh Brown

1. Scott Pendlebury

GO PIES

Neil Appleby · Post by **Neil Appleby** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:09 pm

3. Brown
2. Johnson
1. Swan

Presti35 · Post by **Presti35** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:06 pm

3. L Brown

2. D Swan

1. L Ball

Pies Dynasty · Post by **Pies Dynasty** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:48 pm

3. Dane Swan
2. Dale Thomas
1. Scott Pendlebury

ronrat · Post by **ronrat** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:51 pm

Swan
Swan
Swan

blackandwhite4life · Post by **blackandwhite4life** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:46 pm

3 Swan (only corruption from the umps can stop him winning the brownlow)
2 Leroy
1 Daisy

3rd degree · Post by **3rd degree** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:25 am

A hard choice

3. LLLLLLEEEERRRROOOYYYYYYY
2. Swan
1. Chopper

Stiff: Daisy, Didak, Heater, Pendlebury.

Wokko · Post by **Wokko** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:08 pm

Stupidly hard one this week, i'll go with my gut.

3 - L. Brown. - A Monster, does everything we ask of him and he's now kicking goals.

2 - S. Prestigiacomo - Don't believe the apologists, Riewoldt wasn't some underdone potato, he got tooled. Presti made him look like Fevola, hands on head, gesticulating at team mates and sooking on the bench.

1 - D.Swan - Ball magnet. Was no need for him to lift the team out of the doldrums, just went about his business.

Games like these are where I really want a different system.

M@®© · Post by **M@®©** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:33 pm

3. Swan
2. Thomas
1 Brown

Tannin · Post by **Tannin** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:32 pm

If in doubt, I ask myself "would we have won without this player?"

Would we have won without Swan? Yes. Not by nearly as much, but we would have been OK.
Would we have won without Didak? Yes.
Would we have won without Pendles? Yes.
Would we have won without Heater? Yes.
Would we have won without Harry? Yes.
Would we have won without Reid? Yes.
Would we have won without Jolly? Yes.
Would we have won without Brown? No.

^ There is your answer.

3: Leigh Brown
2: Dane Swan
1: Alan Didak

Dave O'D 1910 · Post by **Dave O'D 1910** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:24 pm

3.Pendles
2. Swanny
1. Daisy

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:26 pm

Tannin wrote:If in doubt, I ask myself "would we have won without this player?"

Would we have won without Swan? Yes. Not by nearly as much, but we would have been OK.
Would we have won without Didak? Yes.
Would we have won without Pendles? Yes.
Would we have won without Heater? Yes.
Would we have won without Harry? Yes.
Would we have won without Reid? Yes.
Would we have won without Jolly? Yes.
Would we have won without Brown? No.

^ There is your answer.

3: Leigh Brown
2: Dane Swan
1: Alan Didak

its ok to take acid tannin but not in copious amounts, yes brown was good but we still wouldve won.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

GB votes - Pies v Aints