#17,#11 Dayne Beams

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Stupied
Posts: 2332
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:29 am

Post by Stupied »

Bucks2014 wrote:Is there away I can hide a person's posts? I don't read many of them but the one I did was idiotic.
Assuming you're talking about a patented 35forever rant? The ignore button is your friend.
User avatar
Flashman
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:03 pm

Post by Flashman »

35forever wrote:Give this idiotic shite up! The only trade we need to make is Buckley for Bomber, then Beams will stay, Swan will be back to his best, Clokey will become the marking machine he was a few years ago and hell, Maxy might even come back.
Bottom line, we're back in the top 4 by the end of 2015.
If we don't have a decent coach we'll get nothing from kids like Grundy, Freeman, Kennedy and the rest, Bomber is a proven leader of men, he has the pitiful dregs of Essendon ready to die for him, and dragged their sorry arses into finals. there's no point talking about Matthews, as much as I love him NO coach has ever succeeded at coaching three lists to a flag. Choco is also very good but he doesn't have the name recognition we need.

Get this STRAIGHT! We don't need a rebuild, utter bullshit! We need someone who can lift the morale of our list, that list was good enough to beat 5 of the final 8 THIS year. With a competent coach we could dominate the competition!
Don't you see it? Really? Come ON!!!!! THINK for chrissakes!!!
:lol:

Hodor from Game of Thrones is less monotonous than this bloke and speaks more sense.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26186
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 207 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Michael

Post by Piesnchess »

perthmagpie wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:
35forever wrote:Give this idiotic shite up! The only trade we need to make is Buckley for Bomber, then Beams will stay, Swan will be back to his best, Clokey will become the marking machine he was a few years ago and hell, Maxy might even come back.
Bottom line, we're back in the top 4 by the end of 2015.
If we don't have a decent coach we'll get nothing from kids like Grundy, Freeman, Kennedy and the rest, Bomber is a proven leader of men, he has the pitiful dregs of Essendon ready to die for him, and dragged their sorry arses into finals. there's no point talking about Matthews, as much as I love him NO coach has ever succeeded at coaching three lists to a flag. Choco is also very good but he doesn't have the name recognition we need.

Get this STRAIGHT! We don't need a rebuild, utter bullshit! We need someone who can lift the morale of our list, that list was good enough to beat 5 of the final 8 THIS year. With a competent coach we could dominate the competition!
Don't you see it? Really? Come ON!!!!! THINK for chrissakes!!!

DO YOU EVER, EVER, EVER STOP THIS ANTI BUCKS BULLSHIT YOU GO ON AND ON AND ON ABOUT, ON EVERY SINGLE THREAD, WE GET IT, YOU HATE BUCKS, YOU LOATHE HIM, WE GET IT, NOW GIVE IT A FCKUING REST FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, AND SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE FOR CHRISSSAKES. YOU ARE BORING BEYOND BLOODY BELIEF, GIVE IT A REST. :!: :!: :!: :!: :roll: :roll:
If you go to Michael's gallery website you will see he is a brilliant artist. You may also notice he writes with the same arrogant and exaggerated tone as he does here. I would hazard to guess this is just a reflection of who he really is. He is not a troll but writes stuff that gives us all a constant headache. The language is all loud and contrived and unbearable. It's a shame really that Peter McKenna is in his avatar as Macca was one one of heroes and is such a gentle sole and the avatar is incongruent with the writings of a person who screams 'look at me'.
Oh I see, well im a part time artist myself, mainly oil paintings, which have been shown at some Art exibitions yet I don't come on here and try to be negative and arrogant, I try not too, and I do try not to go on and on over the same old ground. 8)
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
35forever
Posts: 2684
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:38 am
Location: Physical=Sunshine Coast -- Mental=Vic Park
Contact:

Post by 35forever »

Again with the personal stuff, but you few holdouts won't last much longer, the tide is turning as the evidence continues to pile up that Buckley's reign has been nought but an unmitigated disaster. I don't want any attention on myself, my work brings more of that than I care for, I want peoples eyes fixed firmly on our club and the nightmares unfolding there, it's you in the Blind Brigade who continuously want to change the subject to me and my perceived shortcomings.

@John Wren, as I've said many times, our LIST is good enough to beat anyone...regardless of who is coaching.
Well at least it was, it's now questionable whether enough remains in that list to make us competitive with even the middle tier. Certainly the loss of Beams just about tips us over the edge, if we lost a Sidebottom or Swan or Pendles succumbed to injury we would be just about assured wooden-spooners for 2015. No high draft pick will prevent that, neither will an imported Dangerfield or Swallow as most imports take a while to find their feet at a new club. Besides, whose going to want to enter the Westpac centre when the vast volume of traffic is going the other way?

Mate if what you NEED is for me to stop, I'm afraid you're SOL, coz it ain't going to happen! But then, you don't read my posts so why would they upset you so much? How about some honesty? What you REALLY want is for me to stop pointing out the truth of the situation because other people ARE reading it and minds are being changed, you don't like that, do you? I've been accused of being Dale Thomas and other members of Nicks in disguise, maybe you're Nathan Buckley?? (I'm kidding of course... or am I?)
You call what I write uninformed and ignorant, (how do you manage to know that and even quote things from text you didn't read???) but you don't point out any factual errors because there aren't any. All you managed was to ask who coached our victories, how simple then to ask you who coached our season-defining loss to FOOTSCRAY? Who coached us when we were flogged by the insipid Essendon? And which master coach was it who oversaw our season-ending pummelling at the hands of Brisbane? Any fool can coach a side of confident professionals, you yourself could have sat in the big chair without doing much harm, it's when things are going badly, when heads are down and confidence is shot to hell that a real leader is needed, and we had those leaders in Malthouse and Maxy. I'll also ask you why Maxy and Screw left the club? Maxy was in career best form and certainly could have overcome the injury he sustained, but he elected to retire immediately, the same day as our unbelievable loss to Footscray, which saw us tumble out of the top 4 never to return. We won just 3 more games for the rest of the season. Just another in the incredible line of co-incidences?
And Ball? He was told by Nathan Buckley that there would be few opportunities for him in 2015. He said he could have played on despite requiring back surgery, and wanted to ,but obviously not at Collingwood. How dearly we will miss the experience of those guys and the run of Hertier and Beams in 2015. For that matter we could have used the experience of Jolley, Didak, Shaw, Thomas, Krakouer, Wellingham and Dawes as we were fumbling to make up a fit side near the end of the season. By round 24 we weren't even competitive, having to play kids we had no intention of using this year, and others who just weren't prepared for the Ones having had almost no opportunities earlier in the season.

Just do me a tiny favour and input the scenario of Bomber Thompson taking over as coach in 2015 into the hamster-on -a-spinning-wheel you have upstairs and tell me how you see that scenario unfolding. And no smart-arse stuff about drugs, you know very well none of that stuck to Bomber, if you know anything about the guy, and I do, you know that kind of thing is utterly foreign to his approach as player and coach. So what would happen? Even short term in 2015? Would Beams stay? Would Swan, Blair, Grundy and Clokey return to the form they showed in 2013?

I guess if you want to believe every word that emanates from Collingwood you'd see nothing positive happening, coz as far as they're concerned the future is all sunshine and puppy dogs, but frankly I had a higher opinion of you than that. I don't believe you are one of those 'bible-literalists' who read every word as pure gospel, but let's see.
The challenge is laid down, pick it up or stop obsessing about me. I think you know you can't shut me up.
"If at first you dont succeed...
... oh who cares, we did it!!!!!"

-me, 2010
"The pies are going to the big dance!"-P.Daicos 2010
Visit My Website!
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Bucks2014 wrote:Is there away I can hide a person's posts? I don't read many of them but the one I did was idiotic.
Ignore generally works.
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

I'd do a straight swap for Omeara, it may hurt us short term but I reckon we'll come out on top within 3 years.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34796
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 136 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

"You few holdouts". That'd be the 86% who voted against sacking the coach in your "Sack Buckley" thread number 987?

Love it.
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

Pies4shaw wrote:"You few holdouts". That'd be the 86% who voted against sacking the coach in your "Sack Buckley" thread number 987?

Love it.
Straw pole - means nothing.
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

35forever wrote:Again with the personal stuff, but you few holdouts won't last much longer, the tide is turning as the evidence continues to pile up that Buckley's reign has been nought but an unmitigated disaster. I don't want any attention on myself, my work brings more of that than I care for, I want peoples eyes fixed firmly on our club and the nightmares unfolding there, it's you in the Blind Brigade who continuously want to change the subject to me and my perceived shortcomings.

@John Wren, as I've said many times, our LIST is good enough to beat anyone...regardless of who is coaching.
Well at least it was, it's now questionable whether enough remains in that list to make us competitive with even the middle tier. Certainly the loss of Beams just about tips us over the edge, if we lost a Sidebottom or Swan or Pendles succumbed to injury we would be just about assured wooden-spooners for 2015. No high draft pick will prevent that, neither will an imported Dangerfield or Swallow as most imports take a while to find their feet at a new club. Besides, whose going to want to enter the Westpac centre when the vast volume of traffic is going the other way?

Mate if what you NEED is for me to stop, I'm afraid you're SOL, coz it ain't going to happen! But then, you don't read my posts so why would they upset you so much? How about some honesty? What you REALLY want is for me to stop pointing out the truth of the situation because other people ARE reading it and minds are being changed, you don't like that, do you? I've been accused of being Dale Thomas and other members of Nicks in disguise, maybe you're Nathan Buckley?? (I'm kidding of course... or am I?)
You call what I write uninformed and ignorant, (how do you manage to know that and even quote things from text you didn't read???) but you don't point out any factual errors because there aren't any. All you managed was to ask who coached our victories, how simple then to ask you who coached our season-defining loss to FOOTSCRAY? Who coached us when we were flogged by the insipid Essendon? And which master coach was it who oversaw our season-ending pummelling at the hands of Brisbane? Any fool can coach a side of confident professionals, you yourself could have sat in the big chair without doing much harm, it's when things are going badly, when heads are down and confidence is shot to hell that a real leader is needed, and we had those leaders in Malthouse and Maxy. I'll also ask you why Maxy and Screw left the club? Maxy was in career best form and certainly could have overcome the injury he sustained, but he elected to retire immediately, the same day as our unbelievable loss to Footscray, which saw us tumble out of the top 4 never to return. We won just 3 more games for the rest of the season. Just another in the incredible line of co-incidences?
And Ball? He was told by Nathan Buckley that there would be few opportunities for him in 2015. He said he could have played on despite requiring back surgery, and wanted to ,but obviously not at Collingwood. How dearly we will miss the experience of those guys and the run of Hertier and Beams in 2015. For that matter we could have used the experience of Jolley, Didak, Shaw, Thomas, Krakouer, Wellingham and Dawes as we were fumbling to make up a fit side near the end of the season. By round 24 we weren't even competitive, having to play kids we had no intention of using this year, and others who just weren't prepared for the Ones having had almost no opportunities earlier in the season.

Just do me a tiny favour and input the scenario of Bomber Thompson taking over as coach in 2015 into the hamster-on -a-spinning-wheel you have upstairs and tell me how you see that scenario unfolding. And no smart-arse stuff about drugs, you know very well none of that stuck to Bomber, if you know anything about the guy, and I do, you know that kind of thing is utterly foreign to his approach as player and coach. So what would happen? Even short term in 2015? Would Beams stay? Would Swan, Blair, Grundy and Clokey return to the form they showed in 2013?

I guess if you want to believe every word that emanates from Collingwood you'd see nothing positive happening, coz as far as they're concerned the future is all sunshine and puppy dogs, but frankly I had a higher opinion of you than that. I don't believe you are one of those 'bible-literalists' who read every word as pure gospel, but let's see.
The challenge is laid down, pick it up or stop obsessing about me. I think you know you can't shut me up.
lol.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34796
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 136 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:"You few holdouts". That'd be the 86% who voted against sacking the coach in your "Sack Buckley" thread number 987?

Love it.
Straw pole - means nothing.
I reckon all four of you would have been saying something different if it went 86% against Buckley.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34796
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 136 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Sorry, double post. Would that we all had the good sense not to repeat ourselves endlessly....
Last edited by Pies4shaw on Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34796
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 136 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

John Wren wrote:
35forever wrote:Again with the personal stuff, but you few holdouts won't last much longer, the tide is turning as the evidence continues to pile up that Buckley's reign has been nought but an unmitigated disaster. I don't want any attention on myself, my work brings more of that than I care for, I want peoples eyes fixed firmly on our club and the nightmares unfolding there, it's you in the Blind Brigade who continuously want to change the subject to me and my perceived shortcomings.

@John Wren, as I've said many times, our LIST is good enough to beat anyone...regardless of who is coaching.
Well at least it was, it's now questionable whether enough remains in that list to make us competitive with even the middle tier. Certainly the loss of Beams just about tips us over the edge, if we lost a Sidebottom or Swan or Pendles succumbed to injury we would be just about assured wooden-spooners for 2015. No high draft pick will prevent that, neither will an imported Dangerfield or Swallow as most imports take a while to find their feet at a new club. Besides, whose going to want to enter the Westpac centre when the vast volume of traffic is going the other way?

Mate if what you NEED is for me to stop, I'm afraid you're SOL, coz it ain't going to happen! But then, you don't read my posts so why would they upset you so much? How about some honesty? What you REALLY want is for me to stop pointing out the truth of the situation because other people ARE reading it and minds are being changed, you don't like that, do you? I've been accused of being Dale Thomas and other members of Nicks in disguise, maybe you're Nathan Buckley?? (I'm kidding of course... or am I?)
You call what I write uninformed and ignorant, (how do you manage to know that and even quote things from text you didn't read???) but you don't point out any factual errors because there aren't any. All you managed was to ask who coached our victories, how simple then to ask you who coached our season-defining loss to FOOTSCRAY? Who coached us when we were flogged by the insipid Essendon? And which master coach was it who oversaw our season-ending pummelling at the hands of Brisbane? Any fool can coach a side of confident professionals, you yourself could have sat in the big chair without doing much harm, it's when things are going badly, when heads are down and confidence is shot to hell that a real leader is needed, and we had those leaders in Malthouse and Maxy. I'll also ask you why Maxy and Screw left the club? Maxy was in career best form and certainly could have overcome the injury he sustained, but he elected to retire immediately, the same day as our unbelievable loss to Footscray, which saw us tumble out of the top 4 never to return. We won just 3 more games for the rest of the season. Just another in the incredible line of co-incidences?
And Ball? He was told by Nathan Buckley that there would be few opportunities for him in 2015. He said he could have played on despite requiring back surgery, and wanted to ,but obviously not at Collingwood. How dearly we will miss the experience of those guys and the run of Hertier and Beams in 2015. For that matter we could have used the experience of Jolley, Didak, Shaw, Thomas, Krakouer, Wellingham and Dawes as we were fumbling to make up a fit side near the end of the season. By round 24 we weren't even competitive, having to play kids we had no intention of using this year, and others who just weren't prepared for the Ones having had almost no opportunities earlier in the season.

Just do me a tiny favour and input the scenario of Bomber Thompson taking over as coach in 2015 into the hamster-on -a-spinning-wheel you have upstairs and tell me how you see that scenario unfolding. And no smart-arse stuff about drugs, you know very well none of that stuck to Bomber, if you know anything about the guy, and I do, you know that kind of thing is utterly foreign to his approach as player and coach. So what would happen? Even short term in 2015? Would Beams stay? Would Swan, Blair, Grundy and Clokey return to the form they showed in 2013?

I guess if you want to believe every word that emanates from Collingwood you'd see nothing positive happening, coz as far as they're concerned the future is all sunshine and puppy dogs, but frankly I had a higher opinion of you than that. I don't believe you are one of those 'bible-literalists' who read every word as pure gospel, but let's see.
The challenge is laid down, pick it up or stop obsessing about me. I think you know you can't shut me up.
lol.
I'm disappointed you edited your reply. FWIW, I agreed with your previous sentiment.
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

Pies4shaw wrote:
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:"You few holdouts". That'd be the 86% who voted against sacking the coach in your "Sack Buckley" thread number 987?

Love it.
Straw pole - means nothing.
I reckon all four of you would have been saying something different if it went 86% against Buckley.
I knew you'd come with exactly that reply, this whole list is the same a straw pole... i.e nothing we say on here will change anything because it means nothing except to the people on the list. Straw pole.
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: Straw pole - means nothing.
I reckon all four of you would have been saying something different if it went 86% against Buckley.
I knew you'd come with exactly that reply, this whole list is the same a straw pole... i.e nothing we say on here will change anything because it means nothing except to the people on the list. Straw pole.
what's a straw pole? is it something a straw man holds?
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Pies4shaw wrote:
John Wren wrote:
35forever wrote:Again with the personal stuff, but you few holdouts won't last much longer, the tide is turning as the evidence continues to pile up that Buckley's reign has been nought but an unmitigated disaster. I don't want any attention on myself, my work brings more of that than I care for, I want peoples eyes fixed firmly on our club and the nightmares unfolding there, it's you in the Blind Brigade who continuously want to change the subject to me and my perceived shortcomings.

@John Wren, as I've said many times, our LIST is good enough to beat anyone...regardless of who is coaching.
Well at least it was, it's now questionable whether enough remains in that list to make us competitive with even the middle tier. Certainly the loss of Beams just about tips us over the edge, if we lost a Sidebottom or Swan or Pendles succumbed to injury we would be just about assured wooden-spooners for 2015. No high draft pick will prevent that, neither will an imported Dangerfield or Swallow as most imports take a while to find their feet at a new club. Besides, whose going to want to enter the Westpac centre when the vast volume of traffic is going the other way?

Mate if what you NEED is for me to stop, I'm afraid you're SOL, coz it ain't going to happen! But then, you don't read my posts so why would they upset you so much? How about some honesty? What you REALLY want is for me to stop pointing out the truth of the situation because other people ARE reading it and minds are being changed, you don't like that, do you? I've been accused of being Dale Thomas and other members of Nicks in disguise, maybe you're Nathan Buckley?? (I'm kidding of course... or am I?)
You call what I write uninformed and ignorant, (how do you manage to know that and even quote things from text you didn't read???) but you don't point out any factual errors because there aren't any. All you managed was to ask who coached our victories, how simple then to ask you who coached our season-defining loss to FOOTSCRAY? Who coached us when we were flogged by the insipid Essendon? And which master coach was it who oversaw our season-ending pummelling at the hands of Brisbane? Any fool can coach a side of confident professionals, you yourself could have sat in the big chair without doing much harm, it's when things are going badly, when heads are down and confidence is shot to hell that a real leader is needed, and we had those leaders in Malthouse and Maxy. I'll also ask you why Maxy and Screw left the club? Maxy was in career best form and certainly could have overcome the injury he sustained, but he elected to retire immediately, the same day as our unbelievable loss to Footscray, which saw us tumble out of the top 4 never to return. We won just 3 more games for the rest of the season. Just another in the incredible line of co-incidences?
And Ball? He was told by Nathan Buckley that there would be few opportunities for him in 2015. He said he could have played on despite requiring back surgery, and wanted to ,but obviously not at Collingwood. How dearly we will miss the experience of those guys and the run of Hertier and Beams in 2015. For that matter we could have used the experience of Jolley, Didak, Shaw, Thomas, Krakouer, Wellingham and Dawes as we were fumbling to make up a fit side near the end of the season. By round 24 we weren't even competitive, having to play kids we had no intention of using this year, and others who just weren't prepared for the Ones having had almost no opportunities earlier in the season.

Just do me a tiny favour and input the scenario of Bomber Thompson taking over as coach in 2015 into the hamster-on -a-spinning-wheel you have upstairs and tell me how you see that scenario unfolding. And no smart-arse stuff about drugs, you know very well none of that stuck to Bomber, if you know anything about the guy, and I do, you know that kind of thing is utterly foreign to his approach as player and coach. So what would happen? Even short term in 2015? Would Beams stay? Would Swan, Blair, Grundy and Clokey return to the form they showed in 2013?

I guess if you want to believe every word that emanates from Collingwood you'd see nothing positive happening, coz as far as they're concerned the future is all sunshine and puppy dogs, but frankly I had a higher opinion of you than that. I don't believe you are one of those 'bible-literalists' who read every word as pure gospel, but let's see.
The challenge is laid down, pick it up or stop obsessing about me. I think you know you can't shut me up.
lol.
I'm disappointed you edited your reply. FWIW, I agreed with your previous sentiment.
What will you do for me?
Post Reply