Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player discussion

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9515
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 27 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

North released Bigoa Nyon, after picking him up from Richmond. He's a seriously big unit at 2.05 and was shown taking intercept marks. I wonder how he'd go as an SSP?
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22088
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by RudeBoy »

I know nothing of Bigoa Nyon, but surely if he can't get a game with the cellar dweller Roos, why on earth would we consider him good enough for us?
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Presti35 »

Charlie Oneeye wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 3:56 pm'But we have Richardson, we don't need Lockett'. lol
Oh man, dont even!!
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Presti35 »

Bigoa Nyon has been delisted by Hardwick and Clarkson. He would have played under Fly for 1 year in 2020 at Richmond. 4 AFL games in 5 seasons, I don't think he'll be able to make it from here.

When you see "205 cm", "Key Defender", "23 years old", and "athletic key back who has a knack for taking an intercept mark"... you always ask the question. But not everyone makes it at AFL level.

Here's his VFL stats: https://vfl.aflmstats.com/player/Bigoa_Nyuon
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: Thinking ahead to 2024 draft...(and beyond)

Post by Presti35 »

Presti35 wrote: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:59 pm After watching Dom Brew for Werribee today, I got to wondering if he was any chance as a mature aged recruit?
An article regarding Brew today;

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/09/19/ ... -top-level

Is he too slow and does he hit the scoreboard enough? He has had 2 really good seasons for Werribee.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3809
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 176 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

Pies2016 wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 12:41 pm For Collingwood to find themselves in a position where both list management directions could be easily justified, is a bit unique in itself.
@Pies2016 It appears the outcome to the Draft & Trade period will be as divided as the Stringer vote, straight down the middle.
As @piffdog and you point out, it's the revisionist stuff that irks me, as much as the rehash of mainstream and social media reports into "I heard it from someone close to the Club source" is as reliable as Pub source.

Unless we get another request for a listed player, the Suns / Noble outcome remains our single biggest sliding doors moment of this trade / draft period.
Similarly, if Richards does indeed become part of the equation if either Port or GCS require additional sweetener, then we might just leave our F1 intact.

I do wonder if Noble didn't put up his hand to transfer to GCS, what our initial strategy going into the trade / draft period would have been. I for one, on all of my trade / draft period speculations, gets flipped.
Prior to that we had SFA to table. Magic beans?
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
Pies2016
Posts: 6774
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Pies2016 »

^^^
There’s no doubt the pending Noble trade has improved our trade and draft flexibility dramatically. Soon as I heard he had requested a trade to the Suns, I couldn’t believe our luck. Not because I don’t rate him but because the Suns have so much draft capital ( plus the Lukosuis trade to SA ) this deal will be done on our terms. Just get the Noble deal done quick and then attack any potential player trades with our revised draft hand during the second half of the trade period.
As an aside, McInnes still appears to be without a contract for 2025. You would think as every week rolls on, he becomes much more likely to be playing elsewhere next year. .
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7635
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 64 times
Been liked: 129 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Mr Miyagi »

After the club wanting him for years, any chance we can get Max Holmes now?

And Rayner looked good, stood up in a cutthroat final.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34762
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Pies4shaw »

Pies2016 wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 12:41 pm It’s an interesting conversation. The proven quality for the now vs the punt on the draft for a 10 year, 200+ game talent.
I’ve seen multiple lists and analysis showing how early picks don’t guarantee you any sort of security but i haven’t seen any lists evaluating the success or not of those big names who change clubs. For every big name who changes a club and plays in a flag, there’s possibly two who doesn’t.
I’d suggest the hit rate of the top ten in a draft probably isn’t that different to an A GRADER swapping clubs and playing in a flag.
So let’s not forget, while a mature age player may stroll into your best 23, there is also nothing tangible that suggests one player makes a significant difference between a flag or not.
Footy is the ultimate team game, so it’s also not a game that lends itself to one individual making a significant difference to a clubs fortunes.
I’m not knocking any trade for a quality player but I’d suggest history shows, that route doesn’t guarantee an improved ladder position either.
I generally agree with that. However, we traded well to round out the teams needed for our last two flags. I don't think we could have won 2010 without Jolly and the Demented Panther in the midfield as well as Leigh Brown playing the "Leigh Brown role" and it's clear that bringing in the 2023 Norm Smith Medallist, Mitchell as an upgrade on Adams and Frampton to close down and frustrate Andrews were all decisive introductions for last year (and McStay might have been, if he hadn't have been injured in the middle of a good showing in the prelim). By way of example, 9 of our last premiership team were trades or mature-age pickups from other teams (the aforementioned 3 plus WHE, Crisp, Howe, Cameron, Lipinski, Markov and Mitchell), 8 of Geelong's 2022 team were trades and Hawthorn, of course, drafted an entire championship backline for their 3-peat at a time when I had written them off because they could not defend. As we know, Melbourne bought a backline, too, when May and Lever were available.

I think trading (and free agency pick-ups) for immediate need can be a real weapon if the team is in the window - but the "trophy" player acquisitions are often best avoided (especially if the team is mid-table or lower), not least because of their cost in terms of players and draft capital. Treloar, Judd, Shiel, Beams (both ways), Hogan to Fremantle and Tim Kelly are examples of such deals creating problems for the clubs they joined and heavily favouring the team they left. By contrast, Lynch to Richmond and Cameron/Dangerfield to Geelong are trades that favoured the receiving teams. Lynch was a trade for need for a team already at the peak - Richmond had no genuine target forward and Lynch was certainly that. Dangerfield and Cameron are tricky ones to evaluate from a neutral perspective - both were fantastic acquisitions for Geelong but I remain bewildered as to how they could fit them in the salary cap. If they hadn't won in 2022, you'd probably say Geelong hadn't achieved what those acquisitions promised.

One thing that is plain enough is that it is undesirable to trade out high picks for mids or flankers. That's likely because mids and flankers are easily found in the draft. By all means, trade them in for a need but don't mortgage the farm for them. Just a disclaimer - that principle probably goes straight out the window if Nick Daicos is ever (God forbid) on the market.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34762
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Pies4shaw »

Mr Miyagi wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 10:45 am Rayner looked good, stood up in a cutthroat final.
There's a first time for everything. He was invisible the previous week and unsighted last night until the wheels fell off the Geelong bus. He was great at the end but I do not believe he can be trusted - he is a bit of a bully who depends on finding physical gaps in the opposition. There are plenty such gaps during the home and away but not too many in Finals. There are quite a few big, strong, fast, skilled players who get better in the heat of Finals. I don't believe Rayner is one of them. He's played 12 Finals, now - and that's the first one he's really shown anything in (unless you count his 3 goals at the Gabba in the QF drubbing of Port Adealaide last year, which, personally, I don't). Last night was the 5th time he has played in a PF or a GF and his previous record was, in total, 34 disposals and 1 goal, 1 behind (ie, an average of 8 and a half disposals and a quarter of a goal per game). Last night, he had 18 disposals (14 kicks), 5 tackles and kicked 2.2. Qtr by qtr, he had 1 disposal in the first quarter, 3 in the second, 11 (and 1.2) in the third and 3 (and a goal) in the 4th. That game should have been over before halftime. Of course, it's very funny that it wasn't and that Geelong choked so badly when the game was in their control but I'd want to see a lot more of that before I paid any attention at all to Rayner. But, even if I did, I'd still have the image in my mind of him trying to bully Collingwood early in the 2023 Grand Final and turning to water after Markov caught him in the midfield. Rayner has all the attributes necessary to have kicked the goal De Goey kicked lat in that GF - but he didn't: instead, Rayner was putting on, as is typical, his impersonation of a ringwraith in all the big moments.
Pies2016
Posts: 6774
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Pies2016 »

@Pies4shaw. Totally agree how the multiple trading in of players worked for Collingwood twice ( 2010 and 2023 ) We should also be thankful there are just as many clubs like Essendon, Carlton and Saints who continue to wallpaper over the cracks and get it horribly wrong year in, year out. Let’s not forget, we paid a heavy price for the Beams and Treloar trades and all for little return, so there’s history to remind us we have our skeletons in this area too.
The Lions will be an interesting watch from the trading for the now perspective. Imagine an investment that includes Neale, Cameron, Daniher and Dunkley and doesn’t have a flag to show for it. Win this weekend and the list manager is a genius but lose again and the pressure to make amends while they all remain, increases exponentially.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
User avatar
Magpie Russ
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 9:06 pm
Has liked: 40 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by Magpie Russ »

As I left the MCG yesterday buoyed by an epic final (and a Geelong loss)... I felt a little jealous lately of Hawthorn's young list, Sydney's continued success, the lack of 'big' fish' at Collingwood, Geelong's catching of 'big fish' and their much vaunted success and great coach.
I looked in Geelong supporters faces to see if they were gutted, as I would be, or are they soothed somewhat by their continual 'finals success'? This week the press was about the number of Prelims the sides have made, the GFs the Swans have made under Longmire (1-4). How many finals Geelong have been under Scott... on an on.

"The Swans’ record of missing the finals just five times since 1996 is only rivalled by Geelong, who have missed the playoffs on eight occasions in that period."

From a Collingwood perspective - it is not enough. If we get to a GF only a win will do. We have lost enough. If we lose a prelim then it better be on the way to winning a flag the next year (see 22/23). So I do not subscribe to this continual success without the ultimate success. We have lived it as Collingwood supporters and were the Swans to lose this Saturday...

'Some begrudging musings - Hawthorn are a good side with a good list (of over celebrators). Rayner stood up (for once). Ollie Henry is going to be a good player. Heeney is a great player (finally had the season the press has been attributing to him for the last 5 years).

Go Fitzroy.
Last edited by Magpie Russ on Sun Sep 22, 2024 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54687
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by stui magpie »

^

Looking at Hawthorn and the comments immediately above yours, you can see how it was planned. Trade out old players with currency left, go to the draft for a couple of years, bring in kids and pump games into them. Then last year they hit the trade table to top up with experience in needed positions, taking role players not stars. Now they're going to shore up their backline for the next 5 years.

Like all plans, it's only great if it works and theirs seems to be working.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
slangman
Posts: 2706
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by slangman »

^ People seem to forget that Hawthorn had a dream run with injuries this year.
Mitch Lewis aside they didn’t really have anyone of note unavailable for the entire season.
Time will tell whether they rode their luck this year or whether they are the real deal.

I still think that we are the best side in the AFL.
To miss finals so narrowly after a season marred by a revolving door of injuries tells me that we have plenty of upside next year.

How many games did McStay and Checkers play together this year???
- Side By Side -
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3809
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 176 times

Re: Trade Targets ~ Free Agency & MSD player movements

Post by LaurieHolden »

slangman wrote: Mon Sep 23, 2024 11:23 am I still think that we are the best side in the AFL.
To miss finals so narrowly after a season marred by a revolving door of injuries tells me that we have plenty of upside next year.
How many games did McStay and Checkers play together this year???
McStay has played 19 games total since crossing from BNE Lions in 2023 yielding 28 goals 11 behinds for a total of 13 wins and 6 losses.
14 games in 2023 - played a total of 11 with Mihocek for an 8W/3L record. (R1-R6 inj.>R17. Returned R18>Prelim)
His first season at Collingwood saw him yield 20 goals 7 behinds prior to injuring his knee in the Preliminary Final victory over the GWS GIANTS in which he'd kicked 2 goals.
5 games in 2024 - resumed R20 for 5 games in 2024, 0 games with Mihocek.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
Post Reply