#17,#11 Dayne Beams

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Pi
Posts: 999
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: SA

Post by Pi »

The only realistic option is to do a trade deal with Gold Coast, any idea of keeping him for a year while he travels to QLD and back here to play and train is going to be sub par; and even if he does then he will just walk via fee agency to Brisbane for nothing in a year. Make no mistake about it the Lions mission statement is bending us over; either via AFL salary cap concessions or a shitty trade deal, especially while they have Matthews on their board and Leppersh!t as coach.
Suns are a better option to trade with, more to offer and are more likely to play finals, Lions are just bad news all round.
Pi = Infinite = Collingwood = Always
Floreat Pica
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

Pi wrote:The only realistic option is to do a trade deal with Gold Coast, any idea of keeping him for a year while he travels to QLD and back here to play and train is going to be sub par; and even if he does then he will just walk via fee agency to Brisbane for nothing in a year. Make no mistake about it the Lions mission statement is bending us over; either via AFL salary cap concessions or a shitty trade deal, especially while they have Matthews on their board and Leppersh!t as coach.
Suns are a better option to trade with, more to offer and are more likely to play finals, Lions are just bad news all round.
The suns don't have the cap room.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Pi wrote:The only realistic option is to do a trade deal with Gold Coast, any idea of keeping him for a year while he travels to QLD and back here to play and train is going to be sub par; and even if he does then he will just walk via fee agency to Brisbane for nothing in a year. Make no mistake about it the Lions mission statement is bending us over; either via AFL salary cap concessions or a shitty trade deal, especially while they have Matthews on their board and Leppersh!t as coach.
Suns are a better option to trade with, more to offer and are more likely to play finals, Lions are just bad news all round.
Why the Lethal hate? It's like people just forget.

Image



I also believe he's a life member and generally seems to have considered opinions about us when he discusses Collingwood rather than sniping and bile you get from some other morons out there.

I love Matthews, in fact if the Woe is Me brigade manage to assassinate Bucks I'd be happy for Leigh to come back and coach again (prefer Choco though).
User avatar
Pi
Posts: 999
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: SA

Post by Pi »

There is no lethal hate nor is there any negativity towards our current coach or club management and thats because there is no available better alternative.
It should be noted life membership of a club is meaningless if you dont support that club, Matthews is also a life member of Hawthorn and Brisbane, if there is any priority, Collingwood is last in his mind.

So lets be be pragmatic and remember 1990 was a long long time ago and for that matter so was 2010; we need to make sure we get the best deal and it wont be from Brisbane. Karmichael Hunt hunts departure from AFL may well free up just enough cap space for a reasonable trade. :)
Pi = Infinite = Collingwood = Always
Floreat Pica
User avatar
David
Posts: 50580
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 47 times

Post by David »

Stupied wrote:
David wrote:One question: do we really want to further strengthen a team that is already looking like dominating the competition in a couple of years? For that reason alone, I'd rather send him to Brisbane.
Crap reasoning. You don't make your own club weaker just so another team won't get stronger.
I quite agree, but who said anything about making our team weaker? I presume Brisbane is still going to have to give us a pretty good deal.

They have a higher draft pick, for one.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Proud Pies
Posts: 14149
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Knox-ish

Post by Proud Pies »

straight swap for Dave Swallow and Jaeger O'Maera from GCS......... he's from Southport. Can't get any closer than that
Jacqui © Proud Pies 2003 and beyond
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22048
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 6 times

Post by swoop42 »

John Wren wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Beams not a match winner?

Surely you jest?

Gets nearly as much of the ball as Pendles and kicked 10 more goals than him.

He's our best goal kicking midfielder by far.
not often. maybe it's me or my failing memory but i don't often recall beams imposing himself on a game and singlehandedly getting us the chocolates. feel free to refresh my memory.
My memory is about as good as yours so I'll deal in cold hard stats. :wink:

Possession averages for 2014 **Minimum 15 games played

Top 15
Rockliff 32.72
Ablett 32.07
Kennedy 28.55
Priddis 28.50
Heppell 28.45
Pendlebury 28.38
Greene 28.13
Mitchell 27.73
Jones 27.73
Treloar 27.60
Lewis 27.43
Watson 27.40
Thompson 27.32
Beams 27.16
Prestia 27.09

Goals per game averages for season 2014 garnered from each clubs top two average possession winners.

Top 15
Gray 1.68
Ablett 1.60
Harvey 1.32
Beams 1.21
Fyfe 1.20
Parker 1.04
Selwood 1.00
Barlow 0.95
Johnson 0.94
Gibbs 0.82
Boak 0.79
Cotchin 0.78
Dangerfield 0.77
Lewis 0.74
Greenwood 0.73

(Pendlebury 0.62)

The most offensive rated midfielders of 2014 based on swoops secret formula (ok a basic and flawed method of ave. possies X ave goals per game X ave. goal assists per game)

Top 15
Ablett 64.99 (moved up one place **from list above)
Gray 55.18 (dropped down one place)
Harvey 27.44
Selwood 21.32 (moved up 3 places)
Beams 19.02 (dropped down 1 place)
Barlow 18.61 (moved up 2 places)
Parker 17.01 (dropped down 1 place)
Johnson 16.15 (moved up 1 place)
Fyfe 14.55 (dropped down 4 places)
Watson 13.46 (enters top 15)
Boak 13.25
Gibbs 12.92 (dropped down 2 places)
Lewis 12.36 (moved up 1 place)
Pendlebury 11.73 (enters top 15)
Cotchin 11.44 (dropped 3 places)

Make of that what you will but personally I think it shows that Beams is elite and ranks amongst the absolute best of the best midfielders in the competition.

P.S-Anyone know where I can find score involvement statistics?
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10199
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 69 times

Post by Big T »

The reality is, he is going to leave, and if we only get pick 4, it's still a win in this situation, compared with Brisbane losing Polec for nothing.

Because if we stay stubborn and refuse to trade, he will walk at end of contract next year for nuthin.
Buon Giorno
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6051
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:41 pm
Been liked: 101 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

swoop42 wrote:
John Wren wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Beams not a match winner?

Surely you jest?

Gets nearly as much of the ball as Pendles and kicked 10 more goals than him.

He's our best goal kicking midfielder by far.
not often. maybe it's me or my failing memory but i don't often recall beams imposing himself on a game and singlehandedly getting us the chocolates. feel free to refresh my memory.
My memory is about as good as yours so I'll deal in cold hard stats. :wink:

Possession averages for 2014 **Minimum 15 games played

Top 15
Rockliff 32.72
Ablett 32.07
Kennedy 28.55
Priddis 28.50
Heppell 28.45
Pendlebury 28.38
Greene 28.13
Mitchell 27.73
Jones 27.73
Treloar 27.60
Lewis 27.43
Watson 27.40
Thompson 27.32
Beams 27.16
Prestia 27.09

Goals per game averages for season 2014 garnered from each clubs top two average possession winners.

Top 15
Gray 1.68
Ablett 1.60
Harvey 1.32
Beams 1.21
Fyfe 1.20
Parker 1.04
Selwood 1.00
Barlow 0.95
Johnson 0.94
Gibbs 0.82
Boak 0.79
Cotchin 0.78
Dangerfield 0.77
Lewis 0.74
Greenwood 0.73

(Pendlebury 0.62)

The most offensive rated midfielders of 2014 based on swoops secret formula (ok a basic and flawed method of ave. possies X ave goals per game X ave. goal assists per game)

Top 15
Ablett 64.99 (moved up one place **from list above)
Gray 55.18 (dropped down one place)
Harvey 27.44
Selwood 21.32 (moved up 3 places)
Beams 19.02 (dropped down 1 place)
Barlow 18.61 (moved up 2 places)
Parker 17.01 (dropped down 1 place)
Johnson 16.15 (moved up 1 place)
Fyfe 14.55 (dropped down 4 places)
Watson 13.46 (enters top 15)
Boak 13.25
Gibbs 12.92 (dropped down 2 places)
Lewis 12.36 (moved up 1 place)
Pendlebury 11.73 (enters top 15)
Cotchin 11.44 (dropped 3 places)

Make of that what you will but personally I think it shows that Beams is elite and ranks amongst the absolute best of the best midfielders in the competition.

P.S-Anyone know where I can find score involvement statistics?
Swoop fair stats but the one I always look for is which player makes the guys around him look better and brings them into the game.
For mine it's Ablett and Pendles by a mile.
Also the disposals can be funny how many of them get soft 1-2's to build there stats. For sure Ablett can Rockliff does Thompson does, Priddis is famous for it, Watson wouldn't have half his touches with out it. Beams never gets the soft out the back 1-2 neither does Pendles so IMO they are both easily top 10
User avatar
MatthewBoydFanClub
Posts: 5559
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Elwood
Been liked: 1 time

Post by MatthewBoydFanClub »

Beams is a silky smooth one touch midfielder who wanders down to the forward line and kicks goals from any angle. That's elite in my book and don't need stats to tell me that.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40203
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 253 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by think positive »

Big T wrote:The reality is, he is going to leave, and if we only get pick 4, it's still a win in this situation, compared with Brisbane losing Polec for nothing.

Because if we stay stubborn and refuse to trade, he will walk at end of contract next year for nuthin.
Truth

And I hope for moral reasons, we do the right thing by him.

(And God knows, we could use some good Karma!)
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

Gotta have a look at disposal efficiency.
Pendles has beams covered.

Beams though is a gun and a big loss.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
User avatar
call me frank
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:45 pm

Post by call me frank »

Triple M just reported the Brions have offered 800k x 5 years...
May the force be with us
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

MJ23 wrote:Gotta have a look at disposal efficiency.
Pendles has beams covered.

Beams though is a gun and a big loss.

Agreed. A goal kicking midfielder is a big loss. Hopefully we cover it in the meat market transactions
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22105
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 103 times

Post by RudeBoy »

call me frank wrote:Triple M just reported the Brions have offered 800k x 5 years...
They can offer Beams whatever they like. He's contracted to us and won't even be a free agent until 2017. If they really want him, it's what they offer Collingwood that matters.
Post Reply